Carbon or aluminium: which material should you choose?
Carbon handlebars are undoubtedly the ultimate accessory for road bikes. They are lightweight, rigid and have an exceptionally sporty look. However, the rigidity of carbon is not without its drawbacks, and the handlebars can easily break in the event of a fall. Unlike aluminium handlebars, which can bend, broken carbon handlebars are irreparable. The cost of the latter is no less dissuasive for many cyclists, who will find aluminium a better compromise. For its part, the aluminium handlebar is the best in terms of robustness. They won't break if you fall and can withstand years ofSome high-quality models are also lighter, such as the Deda Zero 100 Shallow road bike handlebar, which weighs just 252 grams. Given their price, carbon bike handlebars are more suited to experienced cyclists looking for maximum performance. Aluminium handlebars, on the other hand, are more suitable for leisure, competitive cycling, occasional outings or even training for professional competitors.|>
The shape and size of the handlebar
The shape of the handlebars is the most important factor in performance and comfort on a bike, as it defines the rider's position on the handlebars. The bike handlebars currently available on the marketcome in three shapes, each with different geometries and measurements. The most important measurements to consider are the width, drop and reach.|>
A few basics to get you started
Width
The width of the handlebars is measured between the axes of the two lower bars of the handlebars. The most common widths range from 38 to 44 cm, however, you can also find handlebars that are 36 or 46 cm wide. As a general rule, this measurement should correspond to the width of the rider's shoulders, but other factors may also come into play. It is important to note that a narrow handlebar promotes aerodynamics and can improve a cyclist's performance in a long speed event. A wide handlebar, on the other hand, will provide more comfort, manoeuvrability and pedalling power, and is suitable for climbing and descending, as well as for sport and leisure. descents, as well as for sports and leisure. However, caution is advised, as a handlebar that is too narrow will reduce support, pedalling power and steering precision, while a handlebar that is too wide will increase fatigue in the elbows.support, pedalling power and steering precision, while a handlebar that is too wide will increase fatigue in the elbows, arms, shoulders and neck.|>
The Reach
The Reach or depth of the handlebar defines the distance between the upper tubeand the furthest point at the front of the curved part where the gear and brake levers are attached. It can vary from 70 to 90 mm depending on the type and model of handlebar. The higher this value, the better the cyclist will be able to lean forward at high speeds. A deep handlebar is therefore recommended for competitors and competitive cyclists, as it promotes an aerodynamic position and better stability in high-speed corners. . Touring cyclists, on the other hand, will find shallower handlebars more comfortable. However, too much reach will tend to push the cyclist forward and concentrate more of their weight on their wrists. If the depth is too shallow, it will affect the bike's manoeuvrability, especially on descents.
The Drop
The Drop, or the height of the handlebar, defines the distance between the upper tube and the lower tubes. Like the depth, the height of the handlebar allows the cyclist to adopt a curved and more aerodynamic position.the depth, the height of the handlebars allows the cyclist to adopt a bent and more aerodynamic position. On the other hand, the lower bars are gripped for more powerful pedalling when there is no need to keep your fingers on the brake levers. A more pronounced drop will suit advanced and flexible cyclists looking for maximum aerodynamics. A lower handlebar will be more comfortable and make it easier for the cyclist to change position.|>
Types of handlebars according to their geometry
The Shallow handlebar
The Shallow handlebar has a classic geometry with a rounded curve and is easily recognisable by its very pronounced ramp angle. The reach and drop are greater on this type of handlebar. This makes it more suitable for very flexible cyclists and allows for the best curvature towards the handlebar for a very aerodynamic position.. Examples of handlebars in this category include the Ritchey Classic road bike handlebar and the Deda Shallow.Compact handlebars Compact handlebars were introduced in 2005 to offer cyclists a more versatile and comfortable alternative. The angle of the ramp is reduced on this type of handlebar, which results in a reduced drop. This geometry covers a wider range of uses, whether for sport cycling, touring or competition.uses, including sports cycling, touring and competition. This geometry also makes it easier for cyclists to change their hand position on the handlebars. Examples of compact models include the FSA K-Wing bicycle handlebars and the Deda Zero100 Compact.compact models include the FSA K-Wing and Deda Zero100 Compact handlebars.Ergo or Anatomical handlebars|>
The Ergo or Anatomical handlebar strikes a balance between the two previous categories. Here, the angle of the ramp is more pronounced than on the compact handlebar, while the drop is less significant than on the Shallow handlebars. The curvature of the side bars canbroken by angles at several points to allow for the specific geometry of these handlebars. Some parts, such as the ramp and the upper bar, can be flattened to ensure a more comfortable hand position. Some of these flattened handlebars require specific accessories, such as Campagnolo Ergopower derailleur and brake levers. Anatomical handlebars offer the advantage of versatility, allowing for multiple position changes while providing excellent comfort. An example in this category is the 3T Sphynx bicycle handlebar.|>
What about integrated handlebars?
Some manufacturers also offer handlebars with integrated stems, such as the Plasma from FSA. These offer the advantage of greater rigidity and reduced weight of the handlebar/stem assembly. However, the stem angle cannot be adjusted, and the cyclist must use the configurations offered by the manufacturer. The geometry of this type of handlebar is not very differentand is similar to Shallow, Compact or Ergo handlebars.
Bar diameter
The diameter of the upper bar and side bars of the handlebars is also an important criterion for ensuring a better grip. It is important to take into account the thickness of the handlebar tape when choosing this dimension. A diameter that is too large will put more tension on the adductors and flexors of the thumb, while a diameter that is too small will compromise grip.diameter will put more tension on the adductors and flexors of the thumb, while too small a diameter will compromise grip and steering control.|>
Compatibility of the handlebars with other components
Regardless of the model of handlebars you choose,you choose, it is essential to ensure that it is compatible with other components, such as the bike stem and brake levers. Compatibility with the stem is determined by the diameterof the central part of the upper bar, at the clamping point. This diameter is 24.5 or 26 cm, and 31.8 cm on oversize handlebars. It is also essential to check the compatibility of anatomical handlebars with brake and gear levers. The choice ofhandlebar for a road bike is determined by the performance or comfort sought by the cyclist, depending on their riding style. This choice should also be made according to the rider's size and physical abilities, particularly their level of flexibility. In any case, whether you choose a Shallow, Compact or Ergo handlebar, it is essential to adjust the cockpit properly (appropriately) so that the cyclist is comfortable on their bike saddle, regardless of the discipline they practise.|>
